UK - Close to two-thirds (62%) of UK occupational pension fund trustees believe they should be paid because of ever-increasing pensions expertise requirements, according to an independent survey.
Between January and March this year, Pension Corporation interviewed 243 individuals managing approximately £50bn (€58bn) of pension fund assets in aggregate. Of these, 142 were lay trustees and 101 were independent trustees, consultants and pension managers.
As to why trustees should be paid, 55% of respondents said it was because of increasing pensions expertise required, with 17% citing the significant level of responsibility, and 14% the amount of unrecognised time spent on their trustees' duties.
David Collinson, head of origination at Pension Corporation, said: "The responsibilities and requirements for trustees have grown significantly over the last five years. This is a result of more -- and more complex - legislation, and also clarification as to the rules for running trusts. Trustees do an admirable job, but if you pay people, it does add an extra layer of professionalism."
Collinson added: "The options that trustees have to consider have grown more complicated, and therefore require a fuller understanding - for example, they have the obligation to understand all the de-risking options open to them. It is also vital for them to understand how these options might work, a significant additional area of complexity."
According to Collinson, a paid trustee in the UK could typically earn between £10,000 and £20,000 per year for their part-time role.
He added: "In any other sector, you would get paid for managing hundreds of millions of pounds. In fact, many employers could spend as much on legal advice in a week as they would pay a trustee for a year."
And Collinson warned that demand for pension fund trustees would continue to grow.
Meanwhile, Pension Insurance Company, Pension Corporation's parent, was reported to have been sent a letter by the FSA asking it to explain aspects of its investment strategy. It has since reportedly addressed the issues concerned.
Both the FSA and Pension Corporation declined to comment.
No comments yet